Flag of bosnia and herzegovina Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Flag of united kingdom United Kingdom

International relations comparison · updated Oct 2026
6.49 / 10
Good

The relation between Bosnia and Herzegovina and United Kingdom is GOOD, with an overall score of 6.49 out of 10.

Chance of conflict between both countries: very rare

Do our numbers match your view?
No user votes yet — be the first to vote!

Head to head: who leads each category

Population
Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.1M
United Kingdom 69.5M Leads
GDP
Bosnia and Herzegovina $32.6B
United Kingdom $4.0T Leads
Military expenditure
Bosnia and Herzegovina $216.0M
United Kingdom $81.8B Leads
Global influence rank
Bosnia and Herzegovina #102
United Kingdom #6 Leads

About this relationship

The United Kingdom and Bosnia and Herzegovina maintain relations covering security, development, trade, investment and European integration.

The UK supports institutional development and security cooperation in Bosnia and Herzegovina and remains engaged in efforts concerning regional stability.

Bilateral trade includes machinery, food, pharmaceuticals, textiles, chemicals and manufactured products, while British investment provides opportunities in services and infrastructure.

Education, tourism and cultural exchanges provide additional people-to-people links.

Overall, the United Kingdom and Bosnia and Herzegovina maintain broad relations centered on security, development, trade, investment and European cooperation.

·
3.1M
Population
69.5MLeads
51.2K km²
Land area
241.9K km²Leads
Sarajevo
Capital
London
Christianity, Islam
Main religion
Christianity
77 years
Life expectancy
81 years

Strengths & comparison

Population United Kingdom is 22.13x larger
Land area United Kingdom is 4.73x larger

The position in the international influence ranking of United Kingdom is 6, while Bosnia and Herzegovina is situated 96 places below in the ranking (position 102). United Kingdom maintains contact with 175 countries, while Bosnia and Herzegovina maintains contact with 29 countries. United Kingdom maintains an excellent relation with 51 countries, while in the case of Bosnia and Herzegovina, this figure drops to 1.

About Bosnia and Herzegovina

Bosnia and Herzegovina is a country located in southeastern Europe, on the Balkan Peninsula. It is bordered by Serbia to the east, Montenegro to the southeast, and Croatia to the north, west, and south. The country is divided into two entities: the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Republika Srpska. The Federation is largely populated by Bosniaks (Bosnian Muslims) and Croats, while the Republika Srpska is predominantly populated by Serbs.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has a complex political system that reflects its diverse population. The country has a tripartite presidency, with one member of the presidency representing each of the three main ethnic groups. It also has a parliamentary system of government, with the parliament divided into two chambers: the House of Representatives and the House of Peoples.

The country has a tumultuous history, with the most recent conflict occurring in the 1990s during the breakup of Yugoslavia. In 1992, Bosnia and Herzegovina declared its independence from Yugoslavia, but it was met with resistance from Serb forces, who sought to create a separate state within Bosnia and Herzegovina. The conflict, known as the Bosnian War, resulted in the displacement of thousands of people and the deaths of an estimated 100,000 people. A peace agreement known as the Dayton Accords was signed in 1995, ending the war and establishing the current political structure of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Since the end of the war, Bosnia and Herzegovina has made progress in rebuilding and reconciliation, but it still faces challenges such as high unemployment, corruption, and a slow transition to a market economy. The country is a candidate for membership in the European Union, but its accession process has been slowed by these and other issues.

Geography & terrain

Rugged and mountainous, dominated by the Dinaric Alps, with only a narrow strip of coastline near Neum on the Adriatic. Climate is continental inland, turning Mediterranean near that coastal sliver. The steep, forested mountain terrain has historically made overland invasion difficult and favored dispersed defense, though the near-total lack of coastline leaves little naval exposure to worry about.

About United Kingdom

The United Kingdom (UK) is a country located off the northwest coast of Europe. It is made up of four constituent countries: England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland. It is a parliamentary democracy with a constitutional monarchy, with Queen Elizabeth II as the head of state.

The UK has a long and influential history, with a strong tradition of parliamentary democracy and a global reputation for cultural, economic, and military strength. It is a member of the United Nations, the European Union, and many other international organizations.

The UK has a mixed economy, with a combination of private enterprise and state intervention. It is home to a number of major multinational corporations and is a major player in the global financial and business sectors.

The UK has a diverse and multicultural society, with people from a wide range of ethnic and cultural backgrounds living and working in the country. English is the dominant language, but there are also significant communities of Welsh, Scottish, and Irish speakers, as well as many other languages spoken by immigrants and minority groups.

The UK has a long history of international engagement, and it has strong relationships with many countries around the world. It is a key player in European and global affairs, and it is known for its military and diplomatic capabilities.

Geography & terrain

An island nation, which has been its main defense for most of its history — the last successful foreign invasion was in 1066. Terrain is mostly low hills and plains, with more rugged mountains in Scotland and Wales. Temperate, rainy oceanic climate. Extensive coastline relative to its size, historically the basis of its naval power.

Source: World Bank Open Data. Most recent available data
Bosnia and Herzegovina United Kingdom
Government type Parliamentary republic Parliamentary constitutional monarchy
GDP $32.6B $4.0TLeads
GDP per capita $10.4K $57.6KLeads
Military expenditure $216.0M $81.8BLeads
Military expenditure per capita $69 $1.2KLeads
Land military expenditure (estimation) $140.4M $24.5BLeads
Air military expenditure (estimation) $54.0M $24.5BLeads
Naval military expenditure (estimation) $21.6M $32.7BLeads
Nuclear power No Yes
European Union Not a member Not a member
NATO Not a member Member

Strengths & comparison

Military expenditure United Kingdom is 378.58x larger
Land (estimation)
$140.4M$24.5B
Air (estimation)
$54.0M$24.5B
Naval (estimation)
$21.6M$32.7B

The capitals of Bosnia and Herzegovina and United Kingdom are approximately 1 621 km apart (straight-line distance). There is a standard time difference of about 1.0 hours between them.

Based on shared language, currency, economic profile, borders and international groups, Bosnia and Herzegovina and United Kingdom score a 0/100 similarity index. This is a fun, approximate metric — not a scientific one.

Excellent relation (7+/10) with both countries

Turkey Indonesia

Which side is each country closer to?

Map legend
Closer to Bosnia and Herzegovina Closer to United Kingdom

Comparing Bosnia and Herzegovina's and United Kingdom's scores against the same third countries shows where each one has a clear edge. Bosnia and Herzegovina scores noticeably higher with: Russia, France.United Kingdom scores noticeably higher with: Austria, Denmark, Holy See, Palestine, Malaysia.

The relation between Bosnia and Herzegovina and United Kingdom has decreased recently by 1.7 points, reaching an overall score of 6.5 from a previous value of 8.2.

Score history

Mar 2024: 8.1/10 May 2024: 8.1/10 Aug 2024: 8.1/10 Apr 2025: 8.1/10 Aug 2025: 8.2/10 Aug 2026: 6.5/10
2024 2025 2026
8.2 6.5
Nuclear context: United Kingdom possesses nuclear weapons, while Bosnia and Herzegovina does not. Nuclear capabilities can fundamentally alter the strategic balance and are not fully reflected in the conventional strength percentages below. These figures represent relative conventional strength, not a prediction of the outcome of a real war.

Let's suppose a hypothetical conflict occurs between both countries:

Solo scenario: Bosnia and Herzegovina vs United Kingdom
Bosnia and Herzegovina 13.4% United Kingdom 86.6%Winner
Battle narrative

Initial phase

With both the bigger war chest and the stronger air force, United Kingdom is well placed to seize the initiative early, striking key military and infrastructure targets first.

Force composition

United Kingdom can also call on significantly more personnel, counting both active-duty and reserve forces. United Kingdom's advantage extends to naval power as well.

Ground campaign

Bosnia and Herzegovina's terrain could make a rapid ground campaign difficult: The steep, forested mountain terrain has historically made overland invasion difficult and favored dispersed defense, though the near-total lack of coastline leaves little naval exposure to worry about. Sarajevo would likely be a focal point of the campaign: The capital sits in a narrow valley ringed by hills, terrain that allowed a prolonged siege of the city between 1992 and 1996. United Kingdom's terrain could make a rapid ground campaign difficult: An island nation, which has been its main defense for most of its history — the last successful foreign invasion was in 1066. Strait of Dover would likely be a focal point of the campaign: The narrowest point of the English Channel, a chokepoint for shipping between the North Sea and the Atlantic and historically Britain's first line of coastal defense. United Kingdom's larger population could also support a prolonged resistance.

Prolonged conflict

United Kingdom's stronger economy could help sustain military operations in a prolonged conflict. United Kingdom also devotes a larger share of its economy to defense (about 2.0% of GDP), a more militarized posture that could be easier to sustain over time. Occupying Bosnia and Herzegovina outright would likely prove costly given its terrain.

Overall assessment

Overall, the numbers favor United Kingdom, giving it an estimated 86.6% chance of coming out on top. Turning that edge into a decisive win over Bosnia and Herzegovina — and holding any ground taken — would still be far from guaranteed.

Want to build your own teams? Try the War Simulator.

agreement bosnia and herzegovina offered bosnia and herzegovina policy greg reciprocal healthcare greg hands remained ready bosnia and herzegovina maintains trade agreement signed neither currently member association process convention investment united kingdom former embassy sarajevo former member candidate country taxation convention united kingdom established agreement based continuity trade december trade stabilisation country june greg trade policy agreement diplomatic government remained june minister missions bosnia and herzegovina nato economic union stabilisation government bosnia and herzegovina healthcare agreement accredited bosnia and herzegovina ready conclude hands stated bosnia and herzegovina european osce bilaterally bosnia and herzegovina continuity bosnia and herzegovina candidate